Comments0 In the last 50 years of British politics, a series of Prime Ministers have been seen to utilise prime ministerial powers in as increasingly independent and arguably presidential way.
More Essay Examples on Politics Rubric The prime minister has been able to control the cabinet to quite a great extent, due to the fact that he or she can have a close-knit team of allies within it.
This allowed the prime minister to have control of the cabinet, as all key decisions could be made with his or her small team of trusted advisors, rather than discussed in the cabinet, and so the cabinet could no longer challenge the prime minister.
Once more, the prime minister has been able to control the cabinet to quite a great extent in recent years, due to the fact that the agenda of cabinet meetings can be manipulated to suit the prime minister.
For instance, as I had said before, the prime minister can make private agreements before cabinet meetings with ministers, so that the outcome of it can be made before and so the prime minister cannot be challenged by the cabinet. A prime minister who first took advantage of this manipulation was Harold Wilson in the early s.
Finally, the prime minister can also be seen to be able to control the cabinet, due to the fact that they have the responsibility for the composition of the cabinet.
The prime mister has the power to hire, fire and reshuffle cabinet members and they can make or break their political careers. The prime minister can exploit this power to control the cabinet, by appointing their strongest allies to key positions within the cabinet, so that they are more likely to get the decisions that they want.
Margaret Thatcher is a great example of where a prime minster has used their power to reshuffle the cabinet to strengthen their power. ByThatcher had removed most of her political opponents from the government. The cabinet seemed to operate as it had always done but it was packed with her supporters and she controlled its meetings just like Wilson did.
Effectively she was now able to do what she wanted in the government. For instance, Gordon Brown could never dominate the cabinet like his predecessor Blair had done. Straight from the off he was hampered by a lack of media and public support as well as a gap in his legitimacy as a prime minister, as he had never faced the electorate in a general election as party leader.
Although he did exercise a high level of control over international affairs, he never showed great control in the cabinet, as he was never strongly supported by members of his own party.
An example of when this has been the case, is when David Miliband wrote an article in The Guardian newspaper on the 30th July which greatly undermined the work that Gordon Brown had done as prime minister.
To conclude, it is indeed the case that prime ministers do have the ability to control the cabinet to quite a great extent, as the ability to compose the cabinet means they can have their strongest supporters within it; they can manipulate cabinet meetings and minutes so that they can control what is discussed and the conclusions that come out of them; and finally the use of a close-knit group of advisers mean that agreements can be made before cabinet meetings and so the outcome of discussions can be pre-determined.
However, this ability to control the cabinet solely depends on how much support that the prime minster has, as we have already seen that if you do not have the support then you will not be able to control the cabinet.In conclusion, one would tend to agree with the statement that British Prime Ministers have become more presidential, but one could also argue that some Prime Ministers, such as Thatcher and Blair, to some extent, acted like dictators.
To What Extent Have Uk Prime Ministers Become More Presidential our prime ministers is the fact that they are not our head of state whereas presidents are heads of state.
However our prime minister is or head of government.
· Mark Scheme (Results) January GCE Government and Politics (6GP02) Paper 01 Governing the UK. No. 1 (c) To what extent have UK prime ministers become more ‘presidential’?
• Prime ministers are not heads of state caninariojana.com://caninariojana.com Level. · The prime minister, like other ministers, holds office "during the pleasure of the Governor-General", so theoretically, the governor-general can dismiss the prime minister at any time; however, their power to do so is heavily circumscribed by caninariojana.com://caninariojana.com In recent years, it has been noticed that various Prime ministers have attempted to reduce the amount of formal powers they have, largely due to public and political caninariojana.com To what extent have prime ministers become more powerful in recent years?
Within the current government, David Cameron has clearly continued the trend of exploiting his office in order to focus the media on him as an individual.