The literal English equivalent "social state" did not catch on in Anglophone countries. Members of Young England attempted to garner support among the privileged classes to assist the less fortunate and to recognize the dignity of labor that they imagined had characterized England during the Feudal Middle Ages. The Italian term stato sociale "social state" and the Turkish term sosyal devlet reproduces the original German term. Spanish and many other languages employ an analogous term:
There is no democracy — which is the natural essence of socialism. First you have to establish real socialism, set the table, create the needed surplus, and then the state can dissolve — which may takes generations. Communism is the absence of the state and of all classes.
Sorry, but the two things are in direct conflict.
|Animal Law Resource Center - Search Animal Laws||This has occurred despite the investment of billions of dollars in structural flood control and the application of many other structural and non-structural measures over these many decades. Even in the face of increasing flood losses, we continue to intensify development, and to do so in a manner in which flood-prone or marginally protected structures suddenly become susceptible to damage because the actions of others in and around the floodplain and watershed have worsened the flood hazard.|
|Welfare state - Wikipedia||History[ edit ] In historian Derek Fraser told the British story in a nutshell. The welfare state, he said:|
|Home Page | Buildings and General Services||The benefits would be available to groups such as the unemployed, the sick, the retired and the widowed.|
|Origins of the Welfare State in America||Microfinance; socially responsible investments; financial institutions; banking regulation; credit guarantee institutions and SME financing; emerging markets Guest Editor Prof. Specifically, social impact investment could play a huge role in the financing of currently unsatisfied social needs, promoting a sustainable welfare state.|
When the capitalist is free and at liberty, he or she will exploit the workforce, extract more natural resources than we have left to give, and screw over consumers and supply chains with impunity.
The capitalist system is structured in such a way and has the built-in incentives to dramatically exploit workers, consumers and supply chains, and rape the planet without cessation.
Make a killing, not a living. With greater power and wealth, more wealth and power is possible, etc. There is nothing about this anti-democratic system par excellence to even remotely appeal to the vast majority of human beings on this planet. Yes, predators do very well with this system.
It actually opens up the field for predators to include those not already in the ruling class. Was democratic socialism good for democratic consolidations in the post-colonial third world?
The left and right might form an alliance on constitutional political economy because unfettered power loses its shine when it must be shared with your opponents for more than a brief time. If it does, it will never, ever, not in a million years, put right-wingers back into office.
It will also, if well-informed and freethinking, dismantle capitalism and get rid of it once and for all. That is, if we actually want to improve the quality of life for all, create a sustainable future for everyone, and so on. Neoliberalism would be seen as a major blunder of epic proportions and the right discredited beyond all chances of redemption.
Centrism would be discredited. Even New Dealism would be seen as far too much the compromise which it was. Basically, a well-informed, freethinking people will see that capitalism and a sustainable future are incompatible, to put it mildly. Pain, for many Americans and Europeans is elsewhere.
Out of sight, out of mind. The World Wildlife Fund estimates that bywe will need two entire earths to meet demand. Capitalism must grow or die. It needs new markets, endlessly, and an endless supply of finite resources to sustain growth.
It backs the predators, and we outnumber them by roughly Blunderbuss accusations of dishonesty, illiteracy and idiocy against people who disagree with you do not improve public conversation. Unlikely imo — but it certainly could be.
Hence, any further comments I see from you on my posts will be alternatively or severally be deleted, disemvoweled, Swedish-Chef-dialectized, Eye-of-Argonized, magimixed, Eated-of-Meaning, hung, drawn, quartered, tarred and displayed on spikes above the four main gates of the city, depending on my ratio of impatience to whimsicality at the time that such further comments come to my attention.
He was one of those proto-systems theorists from the early part of the last century, and he might have benefitted from exposure to lots of them.
I think the tragedy is sad indeed, perhaps a loss to 20th century intellectual development. Meanwhile, researches on this kind of problem — under various names, such as autopoiesis, cybernetics, homeostasis, spontaneous order, self-organization, synergetics, systems theory, and so on — have become so numerous that I have been able study closely no more than a few of them.
This is the key to Hayek, as well as it seems to me an affirmative description of his adherents: This area of thought has lately been taken over by the computer revolution of course, though it remains a fascinating, underdeveloped possibility for biology in general and needs a good deal more observation and examples, especially from nonhuman wildlife systems.
Anyway, I recommend it: The Fatal Conceit is very short. That is my most favorite recommendation for any nonfiction. It is the only book of his that I was surprised to read, because you get a clear sense of his overall anthropological comprehension, as well as his own subtle flaws.
I wrote something very much like the anthropological parts of it, when I was around 25 and had gone through Polanyi Karl and structuralism and Sahlins and Roy Rappaport, after studying lots of ethnology of nonliterate tribes.
To get back to my main point, the fatal conceits of Fatal Conceit are also rather instructive. We read not only the old socialism bugbear but now the suggestion, the insistence, that Western liberalism will do best by patterning itself upon the self-regulation of acephalous systems.A welfare state fit for the 21st century (CSJ) – setting out a vision for Britain’s welfare state alongside the organisation failing to ask what impact it was having on changing lives.
Operating within the University of South Florida's College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, Department of Child and Family Studies, the Center works in collaboration with the Department of Children and Families to ensure information contained on this site is accurate and useful to child welfare professionals and others.
The Animal Law Resource Center provides information on laws/statutes for all 50 states and the federal government regarding animals, including animal control, animal cruelty, animal research, service and police animals, animals used in agriculture, animals used in entertainment, companion animals, animals used for education, veterinarians, and wildlife.
The welfare state of the United Kingdom comprises expenditures by the government of the United Kingdom intended to improve health, education, employment and social caninariojana.com UK system has been classified as a liberal welfare state system.
The UK has among the largest populations in Europe, being third in the EU after Germany and France. Welfare state, concept of government in which the state or a well-established network of social institutions plays a key role in the protection and promotion of the economic and social well-being of citizens.
It is based on the principles of equality of opportunity, equitable distribution of wealth. The impact of the Welfare State on Northern Ireland Impact of the Welfare State The Welfare State was an idea that brought about changes throughout Northern Ireland, especially in the three areas of health, housing and education - The impact of the Welfare State on Northern Ireland introduction.